Level Up Games Combat Arms
Click Here ->>> https://blltly.com/2tl0bz
Combat Arms gameplay is similar to commercial games such as Mission Against Terror, Crossfire, Counter-Strike, Ghost Recon 2 and Call of Duty.[1] The game offers many different modes of play, including One Man Army, Elimination, Capture The Flag. During the 2009 winter season of the game, a special mode known as Snowball Fight was introduced, but was later removed. Combat Arms uses a player ranking system based on total experience, using common military ranks that players can obtain. Completing objectives, killing other players, and leveling up one's rank gives the player money in the form of Gear Points (GP), which can be used to purchase new equipment. Equipment includes weaponry, weapon attachments, and accessories for one's character. Players can also purchase equipment from the Black Market[3] that is bought with real-world money. Primarily, the Black Market equipment is cosmetically different from regular shop items and have no rank or level requirement that many of the free items require. In addition, some items may only be obtained through the Black Market. Items purchased have an expiry date, though some can be purchased for a permanent duration, after which the gear is deleted from the player's inventory.
The hard truth is that combat arms demographics are little more than a talking point that is brought up every few years, typically by black stakeholders. The National Defense Authorization Acts of 2013 and 2020 prescribed task forces, commissions, and strategic plans. Yet, the lack of appropriate funds directed toward implementing a program aimed at change and of any fundamental policy changes makes these efforts appear to be for naught.
Achieving that diversity will require real change, not circulating memoranda, conducting studies, or holding panel discussions. We have offered two ways to begin: increasing diversity among combat arms officers and rethinking the way strategic leaders are developed and selected. Until the Army believes that increasing diversity will increase lethality, the future will remain the same: a diverse force led by white combat arms officers. If we open our aperture to think broadly and honestly about strategic leadership, the Army will give black officers, and others, a fighting chance.
The command staff has been chosen from amongst the combat arms since the army's inception for a reason. When the shooting starts they are far more likely to know what an army is capable of and needs at the knife's edge to defeat an enemy.
If non white officer candidates through the USMA, ROTC, and OCS don't choose to pursue a combat arms career, who is the Army leadership to second guess them All the candidates know that the best track to senior leadership is through combat arms. If these candidates have other priorities, that's THEIR business. It is sad to see this fixation with race permeating personnel analysis. When I served in the late 70s/early 80s, it was a total non issue for ALL parties involved.
Ribbons, tabs, badges and berets aren't enough. Small percentage without a college degree have returned to the hood and were hired earning $80K+ at 25 yrs old. That percentage is much higher if you become a Signal Officer and earn a special certification, earn another degree while in (because you have the time compared to a combat arms officer/NCO/Soldier).
The purpose of this organization is mentorship. One of the things said to be lacking. As previous responders have stated, we submit a dream sheet and we get placed in accordance with the needs of the Army. Not everyone wants combat arms branches.
In 1967 the army played games with certain draftees that didnt score well. They were called McNamaras hundred thousand and were put in combat arms. You could always tell who they were by their serial number. They started with 67. Many of these people just didnt test well and others had no idea about personal hygiene.Now the army is playing with our troops again based on skin color. The military is never going to be perfect. Stop playing games with our military. You cant give a black or white skinned military academy graduate the cyclic in a blackhawk helicopter and say \"Son, your a pilot now, go fight\"! Leave the Army Officer corp alone. It will be fine.
JUST STOP IT!!! I served 22yrs in combat arms & I've seen plenty. I served with Roscoe Robinson (1st black commander of the 82nd Abn Div), Colin Powell (commander of V Corps), just to name few. We are & were all OD green/camouflage
As someone who is completing his fourth decade associated with the military both in and out of uniform, my casual observation is that there are fewer Americans of African descent serving in combat arms, many I was privileged to work for in both capacities. While I find my observation concerning, I am left to wonder what the causes are, given that observations of today's senior officers reflect various institutional personnel decisions going back 25-30 years.
Finally, I wonder if any short term cure, beyond encouraging AA USMA, ROTC, and OCS cadets to consider combat arms, is worse than the current problem While I think the free competition assessment for BN command is a positive change, if we are setting hard goals that branch immaterial commands have to be distributed equally among branches, or to achieve some type of diversity target over merit, then the system is lie.
How is this garbage allowed to maintain any affiliation with West Point The concept of promoting diversity through direct, intentional recruitment and manipulation of minorities into combat arms is blatantly racist. The service is a colorblind brotherhood built on honor, respect, and mutual trust. Our past and our future are in immenent danger the moment we measure the efficacy of our leadership based on its range of skin tones.
There were two reasons the cadets from the HBU were not choosing combat arms, first, they were being dissuaded by African American mentors both civilian and military. Second, many were not achieving academically and therefore not meeting the standard set to become a combat arms officer.
I was surprised to find that the standard to become combat arms and the infantry in particular was one of the highest behind only military intelligence as I recall. I came to realize the high standards were because the combat arms officers stood the best chance of becoming General Officers and would lead the Army of the future.
Both provided positive male role models which is something sadly lacking not just in African American families but in all American families. Leadership starts in the home. Boys and girls with fathers in the home do better in school. You need good grades to make the selection to be combat arms, at least that was the case in my experience.
One of three things will result in this integration effort: 1) there will be a backlash and/or regime change in DC and things will go for the most part like they have for our allies who have attempted this: very few women will get into combat arms, and that will be the norm, 2) this will continue into perpetuity until we get at least 33% of combat arms to be female, or, 3) we will get at least 33% of our force to be female and those in will be promoted and find success at the same rate as their male peers.
\"These units, like it or not, attract a certain demographic and that demographic is solidly heteronormative, traditional male, strongly conservative, and religious believing (if not practicing).\"I wish to key on this combat arms demographic which is: heteronormative, traditional, conservative, and religious. The author has just described 70% of the population of this country that policy makers have chosen to ignore. And, this demographic is not divided by race. Leaders are so far out of touch with our Christian heritage, traditions, values, and practices they fail to see what is happening to the force. They fail to see why Christians are choosing to bypass the recruiting station. You see, Christians are everywhere. There are 320000 churches in this country with a membership well over 200 million. Seventy percent (70%) of the population of the country profess a Christian preference and they are probably armed. To ignore this is not smart. Heteronormative is a polite way of saying this group opposes gay behavior and marriage. Traditional parallels a conservative upbringing. Religious identifies family influence. Then, there is a figure of 71% of military age youth who can't qualify to serve. Lets see: 70% Christian and 71% unqualified. Our military is alienating one group and can't get enough qualified from the other. The women can't fix this situation. And, DOD conducts gay pride celebrations, addresses transgender, and nominates a gay man for Secretary of the Army. Yes, potential recruits are paying attention!
It's been about 20 years since the CF was ordered to have female combat arms soldiers by the Canadian Human Rights Commission. Quotas were set for each arm of the two components- regular and reserve. The goals (except for reserve non-infantry) were never close to being reached so the CHRC was convinced to allow all combat arms to work to one quota. The CF is still far short but a bit closer as service in a reserve armoured unit (none have AFVs) isn't very strenuous- there is no rigorous fitness testing and individuals and not units go on operations.
What happens to the few female combat arms soldiers Most end up as drivers or communicators in CPs. Fitness standards have been reduced across the military to accommodate a more female as well as aging force. None of this matters in Canada as it tailors token forces for the rare expedition and the idea that it may not be able to pick and choose who goes on operations is never discussed. 59ce067264
https://es.onebststores.com/forum/beauty-forum/buy-a-cabin-in-colorado